https://www.facebook.com/groups/1688259751494350/permalink/2659180997735549/
Aktuální diskuze na X-Plane skupině na FB.
"Anyone who sims on a PC for training or before flight school would truly rather X-Plane 11 over MS2020. What’s more important to you Physics or Graphics?"
a některé komentáře:
"Neither of them matter if you are practicing for real world stuff. Its good for practicing procedures and instrument work but not for getting a feel of the plane"
"Graphics, you can not replicate the physics of a real aircraft, what you can do is learn the functionality of aircraft instruments, systems and checklist flows etc"
"Xplane 11 and really every sim I’ve flown thus far hasn’t captured the physics correctly at all, also weather and those visual effects of clouds ect play a huge roll on helping train for different things.
A sim is usually a great tool for practicing some approaches and keeping current in that aspect of things but truly that’s it.
"Both have great physics, you probably have seen a random youtuber playing msfs on arcade mode"
"Not necessarily, what if you want to practice vfr nav? The scenery allows you to practice that as close to real life as possible"
"No desktop flight sim program accurately depicts true flight physics.
Its hilarious seeing all the xp11 vs p3d vs msfs arguments about flight modelling....because truthfully, they are all wrong - they just differ in which ways the are wrong."
"I don't necessarily practice on my sim for physics so much as for VFR flights. I plan my flight, then run it in sim to pick out waypoints and double check times. There is only so much feel and practice you can get out a home yoke... So I would rather have VFR worthy sim than a not-so-noticed change in flight characteristics."
Ti lidi říkají v podstatě to co říkám já, na to co můžeš na počítači nacvičit je dostačující de facto kterýkoli simulátor
|
|
